نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشیار گروه باستانشناسی، دانشکدۀ ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران (نویسندۀ مسئول).
2 استاد گروه میراثفرهنگی، دانشکدۀ باستانشناسی و تاریخ هنر آسیای مرکزی و هند، دانشگاه بولونیا، ایتالیا.
چکیده
محوطۀ باستانی معروف به تَل آجری در 3کیلومتری شمالغرب تختجمشید در محل معروف به «باغ فیروزی» قرار دارد. در محدودۀ باغ فیروزی همواره این پرسش محوری در پژوهشهای باستانشناسی هخامنشی مطرح بوده که کارکرد بناهای واقعدر این مکان چه بوده است؟ درنتیجۀ 13فصل کاوش باستانشناسی هیأت مشترک ایرانی-ایتالیایی (1402 - 1390ه.ش.) در چارچوب پروژۀ «از کاخ تا شهر» چشماندازی نو در بخش فیروزی گشوده شد. این افق تازه، کشف دروازهای در پردیس پارسه، به شکل ساختمانی با جهت شمالغرب-جنوبشرقی است که حدود 20درجه از محور شرقی-غربی بهطرف شمال انحراف دارد، با ابعاد 06/29×07/39متر با یک راهرو و اتاق مرکزی بین دو دیوار ستبر که هرکدم به عرض 47/10متر است. دسترسی به این اتاق ازطریق دو راهرو امکانپذیر بوده است. با کشف کتیبههای میخی بابلی و ایلامی و باتوجه به کارکرد بنا مشخص شده که این بنا دروازۀ یادمانی بوده است. این دروازۀ باشکوه در مقیاس وسیعتری طرح دروازۀ معروف ایشتار (حدود ۵۸۰پ.م.) را تکرار میکند، که پیش از ساخت تختگاه تختجمشید در دورۀ یکی از دو پادشاه نخستین پارسیان بنا شده است. بهنظر میرسد هدف از ساخت این دروازه نشاندادن فتح شهر بابل در سال ۵۳۹پ.م. در دورۀ کوروش بزرگ بوده است. بنا بهطور کامل از آجر و خشت ساخته و نمای سرتاسر دیوارها با آجر لعابدار تزئین شده است. تزئین بخش پایین دیوارها دارای نقوش هندسی و گل است. آجرهای لعابدار متعدد کشفشده از آوارهای بنا نشان میدهد که سرتاسر سطوح دیوارها با نقوش حیوانات اسطورهای گاو نر و حیوان ترکیبی موشخوشو تزئین شده است. این بنای تاریخی امکان دسترسی به باغ سلطنتی (پردیس) را فراهم میکرده که شامل کاخ بزرگ بوده و اکنون ویرانههای آن در محوطۀ فیروزی 5 بهجای مانده است. این دروازۀ یادمانی در دورۀ هخامنشی متروک و سپس بر اثر زمینلرزهای بزرگ تخریب شده و در دورههای بعد دیوارهای آن به غارت رفته است.
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
The Architectural Structure and Decorations of the Monumental Gate of the Paradise of Parsa in the early Achaemenid Period (Tol-e Ajori)
نویسندگان [English]
- Alireza Askari Chaverdi 1
- Pierfrancesco Callieri 2
1 Associate Professor, Department of Archaeology, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran (Corresponding Author).
2 Professor, Department of Cultural Heritage, Faculty of Archaeology and Art History of Central Asia and India, University of Bologna, Italy.
چکیده [English]
Abstract
The ancient site of Tol-e Ajori is located 3 km from Persepolis, in a location called Bagh-e Firouzi. As a result of the thirteenth season of archaeological excavations of the Iranian-Italian joint mission (2009-2023), within the framework of the “From Palace to Town” project, a new perspective was opened. This new horizon is the discovery of a monumental gate in the paradise of Parsa. This building is oriented NW-SE with a deviation of 20 degrees from the east-west axis. This structure measures 29.06 meters (NE–SW) × 39.07 meters (NW-SE) and is composed of a massive wall 10.47 meters wide. Access to this room was possible through two corridors. With the discovery of Babylonian and Elamite cuneiform inscriptions and considering the function of the structure, it was determined that this building was a monumental gate. This magnificent gate, on a larger scale, resembles the design of the famous Ishtar gate (ca. 580 BCE), which was founded by one of the two first rulers of Achaemenid dynasty and predates the construction of Persepolis. It is likely that the purpose of constructing this gate was to commemorate the conquest of the city of Babylon in 539 BCE during the reign of Cyrus the Great. The structure is entirely made of brick and mudbrick: the entire wall surfaces were decorated with glazed bricks. The decoration on the lower parts of the walls features geometric patterns and floral motifs. Numerous glazed bricks recovered from the debris of the building indicate that the wall surfaces were entirely adorned with depictions of mythological animals such as the bull and the composite Mušḫuššu creature. This historic structure provided access to a royal garden (paradise), which included a large palace, the ruins of which are now located in the Firouzi 5 area.
Keywords: Gate, Paradise, Tol-e Ajori, Achaemenid.
1. Introduction
The ancient so called archaeological site of Tol-e Ajori is situated 3 km northwest of Persepolis, in a location called Bagh-e Firuzi. Its dimensions are 30 by 40 meters, rising 3 meters higher than the surrounding lands, located within the first-degree buffer zone of Persepolis. This archaeological site was registered on June 7, 2006 under number 15530 in the National Heritage List of Iran (Figs. 1, 2).
As a result of a decade archaeological excavations by the joint Iranian-Italian mission in Parsa, Persepolis (2011-2023), within the framework of the “From Palace to Town” project, a new perspective on the earliest Persian city of ancient Iran was opened. This new horizon, marked by the discovery of Babylonian and Elamite cuneiform inscriptions and considering the function of the building, revealed that the structure was a monumental gate
With the conquest of Babylon, the first Achaemenid kings transferred an important part of the mythological symbols of Babylon to Persia. Symbols such as the emblem of the god Marduk, known as the mušḫuššu motif, constituted a major portion of the architectural decorations of this gate. In his famous cylinder seal, Cyrus the Great attributed his victory and the legitimacy of his power in Babylon to this deity. This magnificent gate, on a larger scale, repeated the design of the famous Ishtar Gate (ca. 580 BCE), and was constructed before the construction of the Persepolis terrace, during the reign of one of the first two Persian kings (Askari Chaverdi, Callieri & Matin 2017). It is likely that the construction of this gate was intended to commemorate the conquest of the city of Babylon in 539 BCE, during the reign of Cyrus the Great.
The Tol-e Ajori Gate stands as the main preserved monument of the eastern Bagh-e Firuzi area in the Persepolis plain. Built out of brick and mudbrick, it was constructed at the beginning of the Achaemenid period with the same plan and decorations of plain glazed bricks and relief-decorated bricks as the Ishtar Gate of Babylon.
2. Methodology
Despite the heavy destruction of this archaeological site, the systematic excavations applied in identifying the architectural structures and the precise documentation of the finds made it possible to achieve a clear stratigraphic interpretation of the ancient ruins of this building. Drawings of the motifs and figures, along with the scientific study of the construction techniques, enabled the reconstruction of the motifs as well as the rebuilding of the original form of this gate on a true scale. Finally, the three-dimensional reconstructions of this building provided a scientific method of interpretation and a documented analysis of the cultural and artistic values of this magnificent monumental gate in the Firuzi Paradise of the city of Parsa.
3. Discussion
The specific plan of the Tol-e Ajori building shows the closest parallel to the inner part of the Ishtar Gate in Babylon(Koldewey 1918: pl. 3 ), with a rectangular plan and thick side walls, although overall it is known in larger dimensions (Figs. 4, 5, 6). The plan of the Tol-e Ajori building measures 29.06 × 39.07 meters, while the inner section of the Ishtar Gate in Babylon measures 29.20 × 22 meters (Koldewey 1918: 31). The narrow dimensions of the inner room made it possible to construct a roof with simple wooden beams without a central support, as mentioned in Nebuchadnezzar’s inscription referring to the interior space of the gate (Koldewey 1918: 40). The same roofing solution can also be proposed for the Tol-e Ajori structure, where no traces of column bases were found. The presence of a long passageway with two openings on the short sides, which widen into the central hall, likewise supports the interpretation of the uncovered building at Tol-e Ajori as a monumental gate, similar to the Ishtar Gate.
Nevertheless, the main architectural differences in the plan are shown by the benches along the side walls of the inner room—which do not exist in Babylon—by the form of the two façades on the transverse sides, and by the construction technique of the Tol-e Ajori building with a mudbrick core (Figs. 6–12). In contrast, the Ishtar Gate was built entirely of brick. Furthermore, in the Ishtar Gate, the lower section was completely covered with unglazed bricks, the middle section with plain glazed bricks, and the upper section with glazed relief-decorated bricks (Fig. 44). In Tol-e Ajori, however, the brick flooring known from the Ishtar Gate is missing, probably due to looting (Fig. 11). Despite these distinctive differences, the Tol-e Ajori structure was deeply inspired by the Ishtar Gate, as the analysis of the decorations also confirms (Figs. 43–53). Therefore, we may suggest that the two buildings also served a similar function.
Moreover, although the use of mudbrick and brick, bitumen mortar, and glazed bricks for decoration in the buildings of this period is also an example of the Elamite tradition—as the system of mason’s marks also indicates—it seems that in Tol-e Ajori the principal source of inspiration was Babylon. Even the dimensions of the bricks correspond (Marzahn 2008: 46).
The Tol-e Ajori Gate represents a new type of architecture inspired by Mesopotamia, which had already been recognized by scholars of Achaemenid architecture: the ‘monumental gate.’ The closest known example of this type in Iranian architecture is the R Gate at Pasargadae (Stronach 1978: 44-55), which, like the Tol-e Ajori Gate, has a rectangular plan and differs from the Gate of All Nations at Persepolis, which has a square plan (Schmidt 1953: 65-68). In the cases of Pasargadae and Persepolis, the central room is of the columned-hall type, whereas the plan of the Tol-e Ajori Gate lacks interior columns.
The brick fitters’ marks, the motifs, the colors, the method of brick production, and even the arrangement of the decorations at Tol-e Ajori are very similar to the Ishtar Gate of Babylon. The most striking and significant feature is the use of panels with bulls and mušḫuššu in the decorations of the Tol-e Ajori Gate (Figs. 46–53). The results of these studies demonstrate for the first time the profound impact of Babylonian art on Achaemenid architecture. This research shows that not only were the very same motifs of the Ishtar Gate of Babylon used in making the panels of Tol-e Ajori, but also that the bricks of the Babylonian gate were copied in detail for the production of the Tol-e Ajori bricks. The similarity is so strong that if the bricks of both sites were placed side by side, distinguishing them from one another would be very difficult.
Historical sources indicate that the earliest Achaemenid kings employed workers and craftsmen from southern Mesopotamia in the construction of buildings at the imperial center. The construction of the Tol-e Ajori Gate and its decorated bricks can be considered one of the remarkable achievements of the presence of these craftsmen in Fars at the beginning of the Achaemenid period.
4. Conclusion
From a historical perspective, the most prominent reason for constructing such a magnificent monument as the Tol-e Ajori Gate may have been Cyrus’s intention to celebrate his exceptional conquest of Babylon by his own land: the proposed statement in the Cyrus Cylinder would be acknowledged in Mesopotamia, and, if not, it would be reinforced in his homeland. Nevertheless, the chronological elements available to us do not allow a more precise dating of the complex. It is not unlikely that among the fragments of glazed bricks not yet studied there may be one bearing the name of that ‘king’ mentioned in the two inscriptions already found. But even without such a discovery, Tol-e Ajori remains an exceptional confirmation of a historical project of the earliest Achaemenids, in a place where their presence had already been recognized thanks to the Babylonian and Elamite tablets, and where Darius I later built Persepolis in 518 BCE.
The discovery of Tol-e Ajori ultimately allows us to see with our own eyes what until now could only be imagined, and to cast a truly ‘colorful’ glance at an entirely new historical environment at the dawn of the Persian Empire.
کلیدواژهها [English]
- Gate
- Paradise
- Tol-e Ajori
- Achaemenid
- بریان، پییر، (1381). امپراتوری هخامنشیان (جلد یکم). ترجمۀ ناهید فروغان، تهران: نشر فرزان روز.
- رزمجو، شاهرخ، (1397). استوانۀ کوروش بزرگ: تاریخچه و ترجمۀ کامل متن. تهران: نشر فرزان روز.
- سامی، علی، (1375). پاسارگاد: پایتخت و آرامگاه کوروش(ذوالقرنین). تصحیح: غلامرضا وطندوست، شیراز، بنیاد فارسشناسی.
- یغمایی، اسماعیل، (1397). کاخ بردک سیاه، فرضیه، خاستگاه راستین هخامنشیان بر پایۀ کاوشهای باستانشناسی دشتستان، برازجان، روستای دورودگاه. تهران، پژوهشگاه میراثفرهنگی و گردشگری.
- Amadori, M. L., Emami, M., Pallante, P. & Fermo, P., (2017) “Micro-invasive Investigations on Bricks and Glazed Bricks from Tol-e Ajori”. In A. Askari Chaverdi, P. Callieri, eds., From Palace to Town. Report on the multidisciplinary project carried out by the Iranian-Italian Joint Archaeological Mission on the Persepolis Terrace (Fars, Iran), 2008-2013, 4. Science for Archaeology: 59-110. Roma.
- Amadori, M. L., Pallante, P., Fermo, P., Amin Emami, M., Askari Chaverdi, A., Callieri, P. & Matin, E., (2018). “Advances in Achaemenid brick manufacturing technology: Evidence from the monumental gate at Tol-e Ajori (Fars, Iran)”. Applied Clay Science, 152: 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2017.11.004
- Amadori, M. L., Mengacci, V., Callieri, P., Askari Chaverdi, A., Bartolucci, M., Eftekhari, N., Andreoli, A. & Holakooei, P., (2023). “Archaeometric research on decorated bricks of Tol-e Ajori monumental gate (6th century BC), Fars, Iran: New insight into the glazes”. Journal of Heritage, 7(3): 1202–1220. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage7030058
- Askari Chaverdi, A., Callieri, P. & Gondet, S., (2013). “Tol-e Ājori, a new monumental building in Pārsa. Preliminary cross interpretations from recent surveys and excavations works around Persepolis (2005-2012)”. ARTA. 006: 1-41. http://www.achemenet.com/document/ARTA_2013.006-Askari-Callieri-Gondet.pdf.
- Askari Chaverdi, A., Callieri, P. & Matin, E., (2014). “Tol-e Ajori: a Monumental Gate of the Early Achaemenian period in the Persepolis Area. The 2014 excavation season of the Iranian-Italian project ‘From Palace to Town’”. Archäologische Mitteilungen aus Iran und Turan, 46, 223-254. (Published in 2016).
- Askari Chaverdi, A., Callieri, P. & Matin E., (2017). “The Monumental Gate at Tol-e Ajori, Persepolis (Fars): New Archaeological Data”. Iranica Antiqua, 52: 205-258.
- Basello, G. P., (2013). “Appendix, Two joining fragments of an inscribed glazed brick”. ARTA., 006: 38-41. http://www.achemenet.com/document/ARTA, 006-Askari-Callieri-Gondet.pdf
- Basello, G. P., (2014). “Appendix: A fragment of another inscribed glazed brick from Tol-e Ajori”. Archäologische Mitteilungen aus Iran und Turan, 46: 246-251. (Published in 2016)
- Basello, G. P., (2017). “Two new fragments of cuneiform inscriptions on glazed bricks from the Iranian-Italian excavations at Tol-e Ajori, Fars”. Iranica Antiqua, 52: 259-281.
- Berger, P. R., (1973). Die neubabylonischen Ko ¨nigsinschriften. Ko¨ nigsinschriften des ausgehendenbabylonischen Reiches (626–539 v. Chr.). Alter Orient und Altes Testament 4/1 (Kevelaer, Neukirchen-Vluyn).
- Conan, J., (2012). Le bitume dans l'Antiquité. Arles, Editions Errances.
- Curtis, J., (2013). “Wiliam Kennett Loftus and his excavations at Susa”. Iranica Antiqua, 28, 1993: 1–55. https://doi.org/10.2143/IA.28.0.2002114
- Da Riva, R., (2008). The Neo-Babylonian Royal Inscriptions. An Introduction. Guides to the Mesopotamian Textual Record 4, Mu¨nster.
- Finkel, M. & Seymour, I. (2008). Babylon. L. Finkel/M. J. Seymour (eds.), with contributions from J. E. Curtis, A. R. George, J. Marzahn, J. E. Reade, J. J. Taylor (London).
- Finkel, M. & Taylor, J., (2015) Cuneiform. London.
- Joanne`s, F., (2011). “L’e´criture publique du pouvoir a` Babylone sous Nabuchodonosor II”. In: E. Cancik-Kirschbaum/M. van Ess/J. Marzahn (eds.), Babylon. Wissenskultur in Orient und Okzident. Topoi, Berlin Studies of the Ancient World 1, Berlin, Boston, 113–120. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110222128.113
- Koldewey, R., (1914). Das wiedererstehende Babylon. Leipzig.
- Koldewey, R., (1918). Das Ischtar-Tor in Babylon nach den Ausgrabungen durch die Deutschen Orient-Gesellschaft. Leipzig.
- Lambert, W. G., (1985). “W. The history of the mus˘-h ˇus˘ in Ancient Mesopotamia”. In: L’animal. l’homme, le dieu dans le proche-orient ancient (Centre d’e´tude du Proche-Orient Ancien– CEPOA, Universite` de Gene`ve): 87–94.
- Marzahn, J., (2008). “Koldewey’s Babylon”. In: I.L. Finkel & M.J. Seymour (eds), Babylon myth and reality: 46-53. London.
- Marzahn, J., (1992). The Ishtar Gate. The Processional Way, The New Year Festival of Babylon. Berlin.
- Matin, E., (2017). “New observations on the decorated bricks of Tol-e Ajori”. In: ‘The Monumental Gate at Tol-e Ajori, Persepolis (Fars): New Archaeological Data’. Iranica Antiqua, 52: 232-240.
- Matin, E., (2021). “L’iconografia del mušḫuššu nel I millennio a.C”. Parthica, 23: 9-33.
- Peters, K. E, Walters, C. C. & Moldowan, J. M., (2005). The Biomarker Guide: Volume 2, Biomarkers and Isotopes in Petroleum Systems and Earth History. New York, Cambridge University Press.
- Rawlinson, H. C. & Smith, G., (1870). A Selection from the Miscellaneous Inscriptions of Assyria. The Cuneiform Inscriptions of Western Asia 3, London.
- Sami, A., (1996). Pasargadae: Paytakht-va-Aramgay-e Kurosh. Shiraz, Bonyad-e Fars- Shenasi (In Persian).
- Schmidt, E. F., (1953). Persepolis I. Structures, Reliefs, Inscription. Oriental Institute Publications LXVIII, Chicago.
- Schweiger, G., (1998). Kritische Neuedition der achaemenidischen Keilinschriften (in zwei Ba¨nden) 1: Textband. Transkribier ter Text und U ¨bersetzung; 2: Katalog. Archa¨ologische Gegebenheiten und kritische Lesungen in Transliteration, Taimering.
- Stronach, D., (1978). Pasargadae. A Report on the Excavations Conducted by the British Institute of Persian Studies from 1961 to 1963, Oxford.
- Vallat, F., (1974). “L’inscription trilingue de Xerxe`sa la Porte de Darius”. Cahiers de la De´le´gation Arche´ologique Francaise en Iran, 4: 171–180; 215 Fig. 31; 253 Pl. 37; 256 Pl. 40.
- Van Beek, G., (1987). “Arches and Vaults in the Ancient Near East”. Scientific American, 257/1: 96-103. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0787-96
- Van de welde, T., (2017). “Provenance studies onte bitumen from Tol-e Ajori”. in: Askari Chaverdi, P. Callieri, eds., From Palace to Town. Report on the multidisciplinary project carried out by the Iranian-Italian Joint Archaeological Mission on the Persepolis Terrace (Fars, Iran), 2008-2013, 4. Science for Archaeology: 46- 52. Roma.
- Von Voigtlander, E. N., (1978). The Bisitun Inscription of Darius the Great. Babylonian Version. Corpus InscriptionumIra nicarum, Part I, Vol. II, Texts I, London.