نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دکتری باستان‌شناسی، گروه باستان‌شناسی، واحد علوم تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران.

2 استادیار گروه باستان‌شناسی، پژوهشکدۀ باستان‌شناسی، پژوهشگاه میراث‌فرهنگی و گردشگری، تهران، ایران. (نویسندۀ مسئول).

3 دانشیار گروه باستان‌شناسی، دانشکدۀ ادبیات و علوم انسانی دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

زمینۀ فاصلۀ زمانی بین قرن سوم تا ششم میلادی (دورۀ ساسانی) ازنظر باستان‌شناسی و بررسی تحولات و دگرگونی‌های فرهنگی فلات ایران از اهمیت بسیار برخوردار است. در این دوره، ساخت و استفاده از اشیائ فلزی، خصوصاً فلزات گران‌بها، ازنظر هنر و ظرافت فلزگری به درجۀ اوج کمال خود رسیده است. این تحولات عظیم در صنعت فلزگری علاوه‌بر تأثیرات که بر اشیائ فلزی که مصارف روزمره داشته، در گورآونده‌های فلزی نیز تأثیرگذار بوده است. به‌همین دلیل، شاهد وجود اشیائ زیبا و نفیس ازلحاظ هنری در گورستان‌های دورۀ ساسانی هستیم. هدف اصلی این پژوهش بررسی فرم و تزئینات ظروف فلزی مکشوفه در گورستان‌های دورۀ ساسانی شمال ایران است تا از این‌طریق اطلاعاتی جامع درخصوص فن ساخت، کاربری، نقوش به‌کار رفته برروی این ظروف به‌دست آید. داده‌های این پژوهش براساس کاوش‌های باستان‌شناسی جمع‌آوری و مورد پژوهش قرار گرفته است. نتایج پژوهش نشان می‌دهد رایج‌ترین گونۀ ظروف فلزی مکشوفه از این منطقه، شامل: کاسه‌، پیاله، جام، تنگ و بشقاب بوده است. این ظروف علاوه‌بر کاربری روزمره، نشان‌دهندۀ نوعی جایگاه اجتماعی و سیاسی صاحبان آن و درمواردی به‌عنوان ذخیره، سرمایه در مناسبات تجاری است؛ هم‌چنین اغلب ظروف فلزی مکشوفه از گورستان‌های ساسانی این منطقه از جنس نقره و مفرغ بوده است. این ظروف عمدتاً به‌شیوۀ ریخته‌گری  و شیوۀ چکش‌کاری ساخته شده‌اند. اکثر ظروف مکشوفه بدون نقش بوده، ولی برخی از ظروف دارای نقوش جانوری، پرندگان، انسانی و هندسی هستند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Survey of the Grave Goods of the Sassanid Period in Northern Iran (Metal Utensils) from Archaeological Excavations

نویسندگان [English]

  • Soheil Ahmadi Vastani 1
  • Jebrael Nokandeh 2
  • Mostafa Dehpahlavan 3

1 PhD in Archeology, Archeology Department, Science and Research Unite of IsIamic Azad University, Tehran-Iran.

2 Assistant Professor., Department of Archaeology, Research Institute of Cultural Heritage and Tourism (RICHT), Tehran, Iran. (Corresponding Author)

3 Associate Professor, Department of Archaeology, Faculty of Literature and Human Sciences, University of Tehran,Tehran, Iran.

چکیده [English]

Abstract
The period between the third and sixth centuries CE (Sassanian period) is of great importance in terms of archaeology and the study of cultural developments and transformations in the Iranian plateau. During this period, the manufacture and use of metal objects, especially precious metals, reached its peak in terms of the art and elegance of metalworking. These great developments in the metalworking industry, in addition to the effects on metal objects used in everyday life, also had an impact on metal grave goods. For this reason, we witness the existence of beautiful and exquisite objects in terms of art in the cemeteries of the Sassanid period. The main goal of this research is to examine the form and decorations of metal vessels discovered in the cemeteries of the Sassanid period in northern Iran in order to obtain comprehensive information about the manufacturing technology, use, and designs used on these vessels. The data of this research have been collected and studied based on archaeological excavations. The results of the research show that the most common types of metal vessels discovered in this region include; bowls, cups, goblets, jars, and plates. In addition to their daily use, these vessels indicate a kind of social and political status of their owners and in some cases serve as reserves and capital in commercial relations. Also, most of the metal vessels discovered from the Sassanid cemeteries of this region were made of silver and bronze. These vessels were mainly made by casting and hammering. Most of the discovered vessels are without patterns, but some of the vessels have animal, bird, human, and geometric designs.
Keywords: Grave Goods, Metal Containers, Northern Iran, Survey.
 
1. Introduction
Iran is an ancient land whose civilization extends back several millennia, and the material remains of this long history are preserved in its artistic and archaeological record. Among the most significant elements in the development of human societies is metal, which played a transformative role in technological innovation and social organization. Indeed, archaeologists have long employed the use of metals as a foundational criterion for periodizing and classifying past civilizations, underscoring the centrality of metallurgy in human history, including that of Iran. The period between the third and sixth centuries CE, corresponding to the Sasanian period, is of particular importance for archaeological research and for understanding cultural transformations across the Iranian plateau. During this era, the production and use of metal objects, especially those crafted from precious metal, reached an exceptional level of technical sophistication and artistic refinement. Sasanian metalwork not only achieved remarkable aesthetic and technological standards but also circulated beyond the political boundaries of the empire, attesting to its wide cultural influence. These significant developments in metallurgy affected both utilitarian and ceremonial objects. As a result, Sasanian cemeteries have yielded numerous finely crafted artifacts distinguished by their artistic quality. Many of these objects were produced from a variety of metals, including gold, silver, bronze, and iron. Metal vessels, in particular, constitute a prominent category among these finds. Such items have been recovered—often through archaeological excavations conducted in regions formerly under Sasanian control—including areas in northern Iran, where important discoveries have been made.
 
2. Analysis and decision
The purpose of this study is to investigate the metal vessels discovered in tombs of the Sasanian period in the southern region of northern Iran, with particular attention to their form and decoration. Accordingly, all identified metal vessels are examined and analyzed on the basis of their morphology, decorative motifs, function, material composition, and manufacturing techniques in order to provide a comprehensive understanding of these objects. In terms of its aims, this article constitutes basic research, and with regard to its nature and methodology, it adopts a historical-cultural approach. The data for this study were collected through two primary methods: museum visits and documentary (library-based) research. The analysis is qualitative in nature. Owing to its strategic geographical position, favorable climate, substantial population, and role in defending against external threats, the southern region of northern Iran (Map 1) consistently held significance for the Sasanian government. During the Sasanian period, this region alternated between functioning as a province under central authority and operating as a semi-independent polity; such shifts reflect broader historical developments within the area. Archaeological excavations conducted at Sasanian-period sites and cemeteries in northern Iran (Table 1) have yielded a substantial number of metal vessels (Table 2). Sasanian artisans produced vessels for various social strata, and decorative schemes originally employed on gold and silver wares were often imitated in bronze, iron, copper, glass, and glazed pottery, providing an additional basis for typological classification. The research indicates that five principal categories of vessels have been recovered from Sasanian tombs in this region: (1) bowls, which appear in diverse forms and are generally round containers with relatively high walls used for storing, carrying, and consuming food and liquids; an example was recovered from the Sasanian tomb at Qaleh Kangloo in Savadkuh County, Mazandaran Province (Fig. 1); (2) cups, typically made of bronze or silver and used for drinking liquids such as water or milk, with examples discovered in the Black Valley of Gilan Province (Fig. 2); (3) beakers, used for drinking and storing liquids, with specimens identified at Rahmatabad Rudbar, Amarloo, and Siah in Gilan Province (Figs. 3 and 4); (4) ewers (tangs), commonly manufactured in bronze or silver and employed for storing and pouring liquids, with examples from Deylaman and Rahmatabad Rudbar in Gilan Province (Fig. 5); and (5) plates, among the most common Sasanian vessel types, generally circular and shallow with a flat base, used for dining as well as ceremonial or decorative purposes, most often produced in silver and bronze, sometimes plain and sometimes ornamented, with examples recovered from Rashi, Pir Kooh Amarloo, and Siah Darreh in Gilan Province (Figs. 6–8).
 
3. Conclusion
Based on the sample of metal vessels examined in this study, it can be concluded that the southern region of northern Iran constituted one of the principal centers of metal vessel production during the Sasanian period. The most common types of metal vessels recovered from Sasanian cemeteries in this region include bowls, cups, goblets, ewers, and plates. Beyond their everyday functions, such as storing, serving, eating, and drinking, these objects also signified the social and political status of their owners and, in certain cases, functioned as stores of wealth, capital assets, or even as a medium of exchange in commercial transactions. The majority of the vessels discovered in Sasanian cemeteries in this area were crafted from silver and bronze, although examples featuring gilded decoration have also been identified. Most of these objects were produced using casting techniques, while hammering was employed in a more limited number of cases. A significant proportion of the recovered vessels are plain and undecorated; however, some examples display carved ornamentation or applied decorative motifs. These motifs include representations of animals—such as rams, horses, lions, mountain goats, and fish—birds, including partridges and ducks, as well as human figures and geometric designs. Overall, the evidence suggests that these motifs were not merely decorative but conveyed cultural and symbolic meanings, with artistic expression serving as a medium through which broader ideological and spiritual concepts were communicated. In some instances, the imagery reflects the ideals and belief systems of the communities that produced and used these vessels.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Grave Goods
  • Metal Containers
  • Northern Iran
  • Survey
- اتینگهاوزن، ریچارد، (2537). قالیچه‌های شیری فارس. مترجمان: پرویز تناولی و سیروس پرهام، تهران: سازمان جشن هنر.
- اکرامی، موسی، (1380). گاه‌شماری ایرانی. تهران: پژوهش‌های فرهنگی.
- بیانی، سوسن، (1378). «فلزکاری اسلامی». جزوۀ درسی دانشگاه تهران.
- بهار، مهرداد، (1379). بندهش، فرنبغ دادگی. تهران: توس.
- پلاسعیدی، کتایون؛ بابایی‌نژاددریاسری، فیروزه، (1391). «باستان‌شناختی دوران تاریخی استان گیلان، با نگاهی به آثار بخش تاریخی موزۀ ملی ایران». مجموعه مقالات هشتاد سال باستان‌شناسی ایران، جلد اول، تهران: پازینه: 256-227.
- توحیدی، ناصر، (1364). سیر تکامل آهن و فولاد در ایران و جهان. تهران: امیرکبیر.
- جهانی، ولی، (1395). باستان‌شناسی گیلان (از آستارا تا هوسم). تهران: محمود افشار با همکاری سخن.
- چنگیز، سحر؛ و بلخاری‌قهی، حسن، (1395). «تحلیل نمادهای عددی، هندسی و جانوری در سفالی از نیشابور (با تأکید بر مضامین مذهبی قرن چهارم هجری)». پژوهشنامه خراسان بزرگ، 7 (25): 1-14. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.22516131.1395.6.25.1.7
- زارعی، محمدابراهیم؛ باستانی، محرم؛ و امینی، فرهاد، (1394). «نگاهی به برخی از آلیاژهای رایج در دوره اسلامی براساس متون و شواهد باستان‌شناختی». پژوهش‌های باستان‌شناسی ایران، 5 (8): 139-150. https://nbsh.basu.ac.ir/article_1137.html
- سلیمخانف، (1351). «نقش پژوهش‌های آزمایشگاهی در امر شناخت چگونگی فلزات کهن و تاریخ صنعت فلزکاری در دوره‌های پیشین». ترجمۀ پرویز ورجاوند، مارلیک، 1، تهران: دانشکدۀ ادبیات و علوم انسانی.
- سرلو، خوان ادوارد، (1388). فرهنگ نمادها. ترجمۀ مهرانگیز اوحدی، تهران: دوستان.
- سورتیچی، سامان، (1385). «گزارش گمانه‌زنی قلعۀ کنگلو سوادکوه». آرششیوه اداره کل میراث‌فرهنگی، صنایع‌دستی و گردشگری استان مازندران (منتشر نشده).
- سورتیچی، سامان، (1390). «معرفی شیوۀ تدفینی از دورۀ ساسانی در قلعه کنگلو واقع‌در سوادکوه مازندران». مطالعات باستان‌شناسی، 3 (2: 4): 77-92. https://jarcs.ut.ac.ir/article_28857.html
- شریف‌زاده، سید عبدالمجید، (1386). «فلزکاری در ایران». رشد و آموزش هنر، 5 (1): 5 - 9.
- شوالیه، ژان؛ و گربران، آلن، (1379). فرهنگ نمادها. ترجمه و تحقیق: سودابه فضایل، جلد اول، دوم و چهارم، تهران: جیحون.
صمدی، مهرانگیز، (1367). ماه در ایران. تهران: اشراقی.
-عابددوست، حسین؛ کاظم‌پور، زیبا، (1395). «تحلیل ریشه‌ها و مفاهیم نقوش هندسی معماری اسلامی در هنر کهن ایرانی». نگارینه هنر اسلامی، 3 (10): 41-88. https://doi.org/10.22077/nia.2016.777
- عبدالهیان، بهناز، (1378). «نمادهای مهر و ماه در سفالینه‌های پیش‌ازتاریخ ایران». هنر نامه، 2: 56-106.
- فرهنگ جغرافیایی کوه‌های کشور، (1379). چاپ اول، جلد چهارم، تهران: سازمان جغرافیایی نیروهای مسلح.
-کاشانی، ابوالقاسم، (1345). عرایس الجواهر و نفایس الاطائب. تهران: انجمن آثار ملی.
- کریمیان، حسن؛ و خان‌مرادی، مژگان، (1390). «هنر فلزکاری در انتقال از ساسانیان به دوران اسلامی با استناد به شواهد باستان‌شناسانه». مطالعات هنر اسلامی، 15: 111-126. https://sid.ir/paper/136798/fa
- گانتر، آن. سی.؛ و پل، جت. (1383). فلزکاری ایران در دوران هخامنشی، اشکانی، ساسانی. ترجمۀ شهرام حیدرآبادیان، تهران: گنجینه هنر.
- گوستاویونگ، کارل، (1393). انسان و سمبول‌هایش. ترجمۀ دکتر محمود سلطانیه، تهران: جامی.
- لک‌پور، سیمین، (1375). سفیدروی. تهران: معاونت معرفی و آموزش میراث‌فرهنگی کشور.
- لک، ایرج، (1347). «گزارش کاوش قریه رشی رودبار». آرشیو سازمان میراث‌فرهنگی کشور، گزارش شمارۀ 1253 RA، (منتشرنشده).
- مرعشی، سید ظهیرالدین، (1363). تاریخ گیلان و دیلمستان. با مقدمۀ دکتر محمدجواد مشکور، به‌کوشش: محمد حسین تسبیحی، تهران: شرق.
- مستوفی، حمدالله، (1328 ه‍.ق./1910م.). تاریخ گزیده. به سعی و اهتمام: ادوارد براون. بی‌جا.
- نگهبان، عزت‌الله، (1368). ظروف فلزی مارلیک. تهران: سازمان میراث‌فرهنگی کل کشور.
- نوکنده، جبرئیل؛ و ویلسترن، وینسنت ون، (1398). ایران مهد تمدن: باستان‌شناسی و تاریخ ایران، (به روایت موزۀ ملی ایران). موزۀ ملی ایران-موزۀ درنتس.
- نیبرگ، هنریک ساموئل، (1359). دین‌های ایران باستان. ترجمۀ سیف‌الله نجم‌آبادی، تهران: مرکز ایرانی مطالعه فرهنگ‌ها.
- یاسی، جهانگیر، (1345). «اولین گزارش هیأت بررسی و حفاری منطقه رودبار (استان گیلان)». تهران: آرشیو سازمان میراث‌فرهنگی کشور، گزارش شمارۀ 1232 RA، (منتشرنشده).
- یاسی، جهانگیر؛ و صراف، محمدرحیم، (1345). «دومین گزارش هیأت بررسی و گمانه‌زنی منطقه رودبار (عمارلو، رحمت‌آباد، رستم‌آباد، رودبار) استان گیلان». تهران: آرشیو سازمان میراث‌فرهنگی کشور، گزارش شمارۀ 1233.RA، (منتشرنشده).
References
- Abeddoost, H. & Kazempour, Z., (2016). “Analysis of the roots and concepts of geometric patterns of Islamic architecture in ancient Iranian art”. Painting of Islamic Art, 3 (10): 41-88. (In Persian) https://doi.org/10.22077/nia.2016.777
- Abdolhian, B., (1999). “Symbols of the seal and the moon in prehistoric pottery of Iran”. Honarnameh, 2: 56-106. (In Persian)
- Amiet, P., (1970). “Ofrevrerie Sassanide au Musee du Louvre”. Syria, 47: 51-52.
- Meri. B., (1968). The letter or Tomsar, Pp. 29. No 7. 
- Bayani, S., (1999). “Islamic Metalworking”. University of Tehran Textbook. (In Persian)
- Bahar, M., (2000). Bandesh, Farnbagh Dadgi. Tehran: Toos. (In Persian)
- Changiz, S. & Balkhari Ghahi, H., (2016). “Analysis of numerical, geometric and animal symbols in pottery from Neishabour (with emphasis on religious themes of the fourth century AH)”. Journal of Greater Khorasan, 7 (25): 1- 14. (In Persian) https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.22516131.1395.6.25.1.7
- Ettinghausen, R., (2537). Persian Dairy Carpets. Translators: Parviz Tanavoli and Sirus Parham, Tehran, Art Festival Organization. (In Persian)
- Ekrami, M., (2001). Iranian Calendar. Tehran: Cultural Studies. (In Persian).
- Gustavyung, C., (2014). Man and His Symbols. translated by Dr. Mahmoud Soltanieh, Tehran, Jami. (In Persian)
- Gunther, A. & Willjet, S., (2004). Iranian metalwork during the Achaemenid, Parthian, Sassanid eras. translated by: Shahram Hyderabadian, Tehran, Art Treasure. (In Persian)
- Geographical Culture of the Mountains of the Country, (2000). First Edition, Vol 4, Tehran: Geographical Organization of the Armed Forces. (In Persian)
- Harper, P. O., (1978). The Royal Hunter, Art of the Sassanian Empir. Newyork: Asia Socity.
- Harper, P. O., (1988). “Boat – Shaped Bowls of the Sassanian Period”. Iranica Antiqua. 23: 331-345.
- Harper, P. O., (1993). “Le Vaisselle en Metal”. in: Splendeur des Sassanids, Bruxelles: Musees royouy d Art et d Historire: 103-106.
- Harper, P. O. & Meyers, P., (1981). “Silver Vessels of the Sasanian Period, Royal Imagry”. Newyork: Metropolitan Museum of Art and Princeton university Press.
- Jahani, V., (2016). Archeology of Gilan (from Astara to Hosam). Tehran, Dr. Mahmoud Afshar in collaboration with Sokhan. (In Persian)
- Kashani, A., (1966). Arais Al-Jawahir and Nafais Al-Tayyib. Tehran: National Works Association. (In Persian).
- Karimian, H. & Khan Moradi, M., (2011). “The art of metalworking in the transition from the Sassanids to the Islamic era based on archaeological evidence”. Islamic Art Studies, 15: 111-126. (In Persian) https://sid.ir/paper/136798/fa
- Knight, J. & Gerbaran, A., (2000). The Culture of Symbols. translation and research: Soodabeh  Fazail, Vol I, II & IV, Tehran, Jeyhun. (In Persian)
- Lakpour, S., (1956). Sefidravi. Tehran: Deputy of Introduction and Education of Cultural  Heritage. (In Persian)
- Lak, I., (1968). “Rashi Rudbar village excavation report”. Archive of the Cultural Heritage Organization, Report No.RA- 1253 (Unpublished). (In Persian)
- Marashi, S, Z., (1984). History of Gilan and Dilemistan. with introduction by Dr. Mohammad Javad Mushkour, by Mohammad Hossein Tasbihi, Tehran: Shargh. (In Persian)
- Moghadam. M., (1962) “The Picturesque Province of Gilan and Its Past, New Archa eological  Discoveries”. Iran Today, II(4: 11): 25–28.
- Mostofi, H., (1949 AH / 1910 AD). Selected History. by Edward Brown. Bija. (In Persian)
- Neghaban, E., (1989). Marlik metal utensils. Tehran: Cultural Heritage Organization of the whole country. (In Persian)
- Nokandeh, J. & Vincent. V. W., (2019). Iran, cradle of civilization: The archaeology and history of Iran (As told by the National Museum of Iran). National Museum of Iran-Drents Museum. (In Persian)
- Orbeli, J. & Trever, C. V., (1935). Sasanidskii Metal. Moscow and Saintpetersburg: Acedemia.
- Plasaeidi, K. & Babainejad Daryasari, F., (2012). “Archeology of the historical period of Gilan province,with a look at the works of the historical section of the National Museum of Iran”. Collection of Eighty Years of Iranian Archeology, Vol 1, Tehran: Pazineh: 256-227. 
- Salimkhanov, (1972). “The role of laboratory research in understanding how ancient metals and the history of the metalworking industry in previous periods”. Translated by ParvizVarjavand Marlik, 1, Tehran: Faculty of Literature and Humanities. (In Persian)
- Samadi, M., (1988). The Moon in Iran. Tehran: Ishraqi. (In Persian)
- Serlo, J. E., (2009). Culture of Symbols. translated by Mehrangiz Ouhadi, Tehran, Friends. (In Persian)
- Sharifzadeh, S, A., (2007). “Metalworking in Iran”. Art Development and Education, 5 (1): 5- 9. (In Persian)
- Sortiji, S., (2006). “Speculation Report of Konglo Savadkuh Castle”. Cultural Heritage and Tourism Organization of Mazandaran Province. (Unpublished). (In Persian)
- Sortiji, S., (2006). “Introduction of burial method from the Sassanid period in Kanglo Castle located in. Savadkuh, Mazandaran”. Archaeological Studies, 3 (2: 4): 77-92. (In Persian) https://jarcs.ut.ac.ir/article_28857.html
- Tohidi, N., (1985). The evolution of iron and steel in Iran and the world. Tehran: Amirkabir. (In Persian)
- Yasi, J., (1966). “The First Report of the Rudbar Region Survey and Excavation Board (Gilan Province)”. Tehran, Archive of the Cultural Heritage Organization, Report No.RA- 1232. (Unpublished). (In Persian)
- Yasi, J. & Sarraf, M. R., (1966). “The Second Report of Rudbar Region Investigation and Speculation Board (Amarloo, Rahmatabad, Rostamabad, Rudbar of Guilan Province)”. Tehran: Archive of the Cultural Heritage Organization, Report No. 1233.RA. (Unpublished). (In Persian)
- Zarei, M. E., Bastani, M. & Amini, F., (2015). “A Look at Some Common Alloys in the Islamic Period Based on Archaeological Texts and Evidence”. Iranian Archaeological Research,  8: 139-150. (In Persian) https://nbsh.basu.ac.ir/article_1137.html
- https://www.google.com/maps