Document Type : Research Paper
Authors
1 M.A. Graduate, Department of Archaeology from Isfahan Art University, Isfahan, Iran.
2 Assistant Professor Department of Archeology Faculty of Literature and Human Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract
The artists of ancient times created pictures with simple lines and engraved their mark and identity on them. With its special features, this art encourages us to examine the carved shapes on the stones with a more sensitive eye. These works of art in the field of art history and archeology have displayed a wide range of ecosystems and animal and plant life and its relationship with human life. In Tafarsh City and the field of art and archeology, there are valuable works left. The purpose of this research is a detailed and methodical study of the paintings of Zaghar, Derbar, Haftan, and Qaleh Ghamt Kuh villages of Tafarsh city in terms of petroglyphs, reflection of cultural beliefs, relative chronology, and geology. In this research, we try to answer two questions based on the investigations: first, according to the typological comparison, to what time range do the petroglyphs of the Tafarsh region belong, and secondly, do the petroglyphs belong Were there nomadic societies or did settled societies play a role in its creation? The obtained data were first identified by survey method, photographed, and photographed by mollage vector method. Due to the lack of laboratory facilities, only by relying on semantic and conceptual interpretation, their time can be recognized approximately. It is believed that the paintings belong to the Sassanid period. According to the fact that all four locations were located next to the roads and it was probably the movement, so it seems that the petroglyphs belonged to the nomadic communities.
Keywords
Main Subjects
Askarpour. V. 2016. Before the history of Naqshs, an archaeological introduction to the origin and evolution of visual expressions. Golha: 112-115. [in Persian].
Bahn. P. 1998. The Cambridge Illustrated History of Prehistoric Art. Cambridge University Press.
Bednarik. R. 1994. Age estimates of Bolivian petroglyphs. AURA Newsletter15 (1):4.
Chauvet. J. Deschamps. E. Hillaire. C. 1996. Dawn of Art (The Oldest Known Paintings in the World).
- Lightfoot. C. Milbrath. 2010. Art and Human Development. Psychology Press: 150.
Farhadi. M. 1998. Museums in the wind: a treatise on the anthropology of the art of reporting on the collection of petroglyphs and innovative rock symbols of Timre. Publications of Allameh Tabatabai University: 205-210. [in Persian].
Farhadi. M. 1995. Museums in the wind: introducing the huge collection of newly discovered petroglyphs of "Timre. Social Sciences Quarterly of Allameh University. [in Persian].
GHorbani. H. Sadeghi. S. 2016. A comparative study of the antelope image in the petroglyphs of the east and west of Iran (a case study; Sarbisheh and Oraman). Social cultural studies of Khorasan: 1. [in Persian].
Gibson. J. 1979. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Hajian. J. 1973. Geological map 1/100000 Tafaresh. Geological Organization of Iran. [in Persian].
Ingold. T. 1998. Culture, Nature, Environment: Step to an Ecology of Life. Mind, Brain, and the Environment. Oxford UO Oxford: 80.
Karimi. F. 2007. A new perspective on the rock carvings of Iran (based on field studies). Bastan Pazhohi Journal: 20-31. [in Persian].
Norollahi. A. 2016. The petroglyphs of Yazli Chai, Ghandom Kouh, and Zaghar.Diar Journal: 110. [in Persian].
Plucker. J. Makel. M. 2010. Assessment of creativity. The Cambridge handbook of creativity: 55.
Stocklin. J. 1968. Structural History and Tectonic of Iran. A Review. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin USA: 52
)